It’s a structured-light 3D scanner developed by PrimeSense. While being used for measuring the three-dimensional shape of an object I think it should be possible to use it as a 3D vision system for indoor robots. So I would really like to see hackers taking this cheap device apart and re-purposing it for home-brew 3D vision. In their paper “A low cost 3D scanner based on structured light“, Rocchini et al. describe how to build one and this incredible instructables article explains how to build one also and even provides source code.

Of course there are other exiting technologies out there, a comprehensive list of 3D vision devices can be found at acroname.com (including prices). The devices range from expensive but effective and impressive Time-of-flight cameras (vendors: [1] [2] [3]) to LIDAR systems. The latter were very successfully used in DARPA’s Urban Challenge autonomous driving competition. A very interesting video that describes how LIDAR works in detail is available at blip.tv.

Of course there’s also the good old ultrasonic and infrared sensors that are cheap and have low resolution and are moderately reliable but they can certainly be very useful.

You can access the PDF from here and the source (OpenOffice Writer document) here. If you find it useful or would like an item added, feel free to leave a comment.

It’s a question, an error, a warning, an information and an idea icon. I currently use them in software documentation using the Shpinx Python Documentation Generator. It’s a very good tool to create beautiful documentation especially for software projects but I also use it to publish my game design document. Here’s an example of how the icons could be used:

I based the icons upon images from the Tango Icon Gallery. You may download an archive containing the source (Inkscape .svg) and PNGs of different size here. Use them as you wish, if you find them useful I’d be very happy if you left a comment here.

This was supposed to be a very literal copy of Master of Orion that you could play online with up to 15 other players on one map. Yet now I have something different in mind and I also have a different approach. It will only be a hobby project and I don’t plan to get immediate results, I want it to progress and evolve in my mind until I’m at a point where I can start writing code. Writing the code should be just handcraft at that point as I have most of the skills and knowledge to develop such a game.

What I’m doing now is writing a design document. The design will be highly influenced by the Foundation Series, one of the greatest science fiction series ever written. The first version of the design document can be found here. I still want the game to have a Master of Orion look and feel to it and it will certainly be a 4X type of game but I want different factions to be completely different (comparable to the different races in Starcraft) in the way they are played. I would like to see a “First Foundation” faction that relies on technology, economy and firepower and a “Second Foundation” faction that relies solely on the power of their minds, e.g. mind control. More about that can be found int the design document. A third faction is also possible but I have no concrete ideas about that yet. As the game design and the game itself progresses I will occasional write articles about it here on this blog.

On two occasions I have been asked, ‘Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?’ I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. Charles Babbage

Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. Antoine de Saint Exupéry

To iterate is human, to recurse divine. L. Peter Deutsch

Don’t worry about people stealing your ideas. If it’s original, you’ll have to ram it down their throats. Howard Aiken

People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware. Alan Kay

And on a less serious note a colleague of mine told me a couple of hilarious science jokes from Brian Malow. Watch a video of the jokes here. My favourite:

A room temperature superconductor walks into a bar. The bartender says, “We don’t serve any superconductors in this bar.” The room temperature superconductor leaves without putting up any resistance.

Another caveat I found is also related to array indexes. When using a Matlab function that takes as parameters matrix indexes you might think of creating an mwArray of type mxUINT32_CLASS. Wrong. You have to pass indices – as strange as it sounds – as doubles so you should use mxDOUBLE_CLASS.

One custom Matlab function I wanted to use in C++ took as an argument a cell array. A cell array is an array containing other arrays. In Matlab you create a cell array like this:

a = magic(5);
b = ones(3);
z{1} = a;
z{2} = b;

If you look at z now you will get something like this:

z =
[5x5 double] [3x3 double]

An array of arrays. Easy. Well if you want to construct a cell array in C++ you have to do something like this:

mwArray a(5, 5, mxDOUBLE_CLASS);
mwArray b(3, 3, mxINT16_CLASS);
mwArray z(1, 2, mxCELL_CLASS);
z.Get(1,1).Set(a); // Sets z(1) = a
z.Get(1,2).Set(b); // Sets z(2) = b

You can find the description on this page.
If you get used to those little quirks however the Matlab Compiler is a very powerful tool to include your crazy Matlab scripts in a stand alone C++ application. One of the next things I would like to investigate are free (open source) Matlab Compiler alternatives such as the Octave C++ integration and compiler.

The two images show our drone dubbed B.I.R.D. (Basic intelligent research drone) in flight and the microcontrollers and sensors that control the drone. It is based on the the Mikrokopter project.

Another very interesting drone is the nano air vehicle by AeroVironment. It’s a flapping-wing vehicle for indoors use. Check out this amazing video to see it in action. I’m guessing that while the flapping-wing design is a lot more complicated than the brushless motors in our drone it is more energy efficient.

The third drone I would like to share was built by Armadillo Aerospace. They claim level 2 of the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge with it. For more information read on here and be sure to check out this video. Notice how large this vehicle is (can be seen in the end of the video).

The fourth drone is really scary. And it’s not civilian at all. It’s called the Multiple Kill Vehicle and was supposed to shoot down intercontinental rockets in space. The project is apparently canceled but the video is impressive and scary nevertheless. Check it out here.

Update: Researchers at MIT’s Robust Robotics Group have developed a robotic helicopter capable of autonomously flying inside buildings or other GPS-denied environments. Here’s a very interesting video about their project. They achieved what we planned for our project – and I have to say it is very impressive and they did an excellent job.

I wanted to show multiple threads communicating and synchronizing with each other. I’ve read the argument that something like multithreading concerns only the implementation of a system and can thus be ignored when modeling. I agree with the argument however there will come a time in the development phase of a system when one needs to think about multithreading and one wants to sketch out how the system facilitates multiple threads to be efficient. And for that I have not found good tool within UML.

So I searched for examples of diagrams that visualize multithreading. The collage shows 4 different diagrams I found rather interesting. The first one is from this page about a traffic simulator written in Java (orignal image). It shows different threads and how they signal each other. It’s simple yet quite clear what is going an. The second image is taken from a CodeProject documentation about a genetic library (original image). It sort of uses UML symbols but it’s not clear what happens at the fork and join points. The way I figure it, those symbols inside the threads are supposed to be branches not forks. The third image is also from a CodeProject page – this time it’s a how-to about avoiding an exception when using multiple threads (original image). It reminds me of a sequence diagram. There are no blocking states in the diagram and I figure in this particular application the threads are non-blocking so diagram fits the application perfectly. The fourth diagram I liked the most. It’s from the Multithreaded Programming with ThreadMentor tutorial (original image) and has special symbols for sending signals and waiting for signals.

So I gave it a try myself and tried to model a simple controller and worker thread scenario based on the last of the example diagrams I found. The gray boxes and circle represent a signaling concept where one thread can send a signal and the other thread waits until it receives the signal. I also included a shared variable that handles the task shutdown. One thread can set the variable and the other branches depending on that variable. I am not happy yet with this particular part of the image. If anyone has a better idea or pointer to resources on that topic feel free to leave a comment.

7-Zip is an open source file archiver with a high compression ratio. It supports all common archive types. Avast is a free (for personal use) anti virus kit, that protects my system from all those nasty pieces of software out there. Cygwin is an ingenious collection of tools that provides a Linux-like environment for Windows. You can use it with puttycyg to get a very easy to use Linux-like shell with all the tools you miss so badly on Windows. And for those good old DOS games you miss so much there’s DOSBox, the x86 emulator with DOS. Check out a number of old free but totally awesome games you can play on the DOSBox here. For file-transfers there’s FileZilla for FTP and for SFTP there’s WinSCP. And of course there’s everybody’s favorite browsers Firefox and Opera for browsing and ‘being connected’. From what I hear Opera 10 will be out any day now. For my document viewing, editing and creation needs I heavily rely on Texmaker, MiKTeX, GSview and of course OpenOffice.org.

For image creation I just love Inkscape. It has to be one of the greatest open source tools ever created. For graph creation I use gnuplot also I have to say I have been using the graphing tools of MATLAB a lot lately due to ease of use. For text and code editing I use either Notepad++ or Vim. It depends on my mood really. To communicate online I use mostly the cute pidgin universal chat client but I also sometimes log on to IRC using mIRC. For all my media and entertainment needs I have the great and famous VLC media player of course but I tend to use Winamp for audio playback. To download torrent files I use µTorrent and to connect to remote servers I use PuTTY.

I use XAMPP for web development and the ingenious VirtualBox x86 virtualization software for testing on different systems. When my harddrives are a cluttered mess I use WinDirStat to get a hold of the chaos and clean it up. And recently I accidentally deleted files from the SD-Card of my mobile phone and was able to recover them instantly using the awesome Photorec data recovery software.

That’s it for my list. I hope someone out there will find this list useful.

I admit the graph is a bit ambiguous and it would be much better to count the number of links in blog posts that link to the respective product. But let’s just assume that the graph is an accurate representation of the buzz those products created.

So Wolfram. I like what they did but have a couple of problems with it. For one I feel like they kind of not understood what it is all about these days. They ignore collaboration, wisdom of the crowd, free knowledge and all that good stuff we have today. But they don’t want that, they want scientific accuracy and control over their content. That’s fine I think but I would have loved to see all those smart people to contribute to a project like Wikipedia or freebase. And maybe they could have dedicated some of their enormous brainpower to finally getting NLP off the ground to provide a nice interface to all the information out there and to establish some ground rules about how we should do NLP.

Bing, well – pretty pictures. That’s really all it is for me personally. The name is certainly better than their Live Search thing but I don’t like the interface at all.

And then for Google Wave: I really hope this product will not succeed and will not revolutionize anything. It’s in the first few minutes of the demo why it would be very scary to have Wave around. Lars Rasmussen says that E-Mail is bad because it’s peer to peer, not very comfortable and whatnot. So he proposes to put the Wave (i.e. Google) in the middle of all that communication. Scary.

What’s really awesome is Google Squared. It’s by no means perfect – still a lot of rough edges – but has a lot of potential. I hope to see some serious work done on that thing and maybe an API for us developers to play with and create new things.